<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Mad Genealogist &#187; Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=23" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:42:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>1795 Carey&#8217;s American Atlas</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=568&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=1795-careys-american-atlas</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=568#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I now have all the 1795 Carey&#8217;s American Atlas maps online and ready to view at http://www.familyhistory101.com/maps/1795.html . The below list is what I have available for viewing. Just click the text link on the page. United States Connecticut From the best Authorities Delineated &#38; Engraved by A. Doolittle N. Haven. Delaware, from the best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now have all the 1795 Carey&#8217;s American Atlas maps online and ready to view at <a href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/maps/1795.html">http://www.familyhistory101.com/maps/1795.html</a> . The below list is what I have available for viewing. Just click the text link on the page.</p>
<ul>
<li>United States</li>
<li>Connecticut From the best Authorities Delineated &amp; Engraved by A. Doolittle N. Haven.</li>
<li>Delaware, from the best Authorities. W. Barker, sculp. Philada.</li>
<li>Georgia, from the latest Authorities. W. Barker, sculp.</li>
<li>Kentucky, Reduced from Elihu Barker&#8217;s Large Map. W. Barker sculp.</li>
<li>The State of Maryland, from the best Authorities by Samuel Lewis. W. Barker sculp.</li>
<li>The State of Massachusetts, Compiled from the best Authorities By Samuel Lewis.</li>
<li>Maine 	The Province of Maine, From the best Authorities by Samuel Lewis</li>
<li>North Carolina 	The State of North Carolina from the best Authorities, &amp;c. by Samuel Lewis.</li>
<li>New Hampshire 	The State of New Hampshire. Compiled chiefly from Actual Surveys. By Samuel Lewis,</li>
<li>New Jersey 	The State of New Jersey Compiled from the most Authentic Information. Compiled by Samuel Lewis.</li>
<li>New York 	The State of New York Compiled from the best Authorities, By Samuel Lewis.</li>
<li>Pennsylvania 	The State of Pennsylvania reduced with permission from Reading Howell&#8217;s Map, by Samuel Lewis. Smither Sculp.</li>
<li>Rhode Island 	The State of Rhode Island compiled from the Surveys and Observations of Caleb Harris, By Harding Harris. J. Smither sculp.</li>
<li>South Carolina 	The State of South Carolina: from the best Authorities, By Samuel Lewis.</li>
<li>Tennessee 	A Map of The Tennessee (sic) Government formerly Part of North Carolina taken Chiefly from Surveys by Genl. D. Smith &amp; others. J.T. Scott sculp.</li>
<li>Virginia 	The State of Virginia from the best Authorities, By Samuel Lewis.</li>
<li>Vermont 	Vermont From actual Survey Delineated &amp; Engraved by Amos Doolittle N.H.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=568</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever Happened to the Ironclads from the Civil War?</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=561&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=whatever-happened-to-the-ironclads-from-the-civil-war</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=561#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ironclads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confederate Ironclads CSS Albemarle, Albemarle type. Sunk by spar torpedo in Roanoke River near Plymouth NC 28 Oct 1864 (0 killed). Raised by Union 21 Apr 1865. Sold to be broken up 15 Oct 1867. CSS Arkansas, Arkansas type. Destroyed to prevent capture above Baton Rouge LA 6 Aug 1862. Wreck located in 1981 under [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #c10000;"> <strong>Confederate Ironclads</strong> </span></p>
<ul><span style="color: #c10000;"></p>
<li><strong>CSS <em>Albemarle</em></strong>, <em>Albemarle</em> type.  Sunk by spar torpedo in Roanoke River near Plymouth NC 28 Oct  1864 (0 killed).  Raised by Union 21 Apr 1865.  Sold to be broken up 15  Oct 1867.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Arkansas</em></strong>, <em>Arkansas</em> type.  Destroyed to prevent capture above Baton Rouge LA 6 Aug 1862.  Wreck located in 1981 under a rock levee at Baton Rouge.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Atlanta</em></strong>.  Captured by USS <em>Weehawken</em> and <em>Nahant</em> in Wassaw Sound near Savannah River 17 Jun 1863, taken into Union service; see USS <em>Atlanta</em>.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Baltic</em></strong>.  Armor removed Jul 1864.  Surrendered at Nanna  Hubba Bluff in Tombigbee River AL 10 May 1865.  Sold to be broken up 31  Dec 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Charleston</em></strong>.  Destroyed to prevent capture in Cooper River above Charleston Harbor 18 Feb 1865.  Wreck removed shortly after 1870.</li>
<li> &#8220;Cheops,&#8221; <em>Stonewall</em> type.  Never delivered to the Confederacy; sold to Prussia 29 Oct 1865, named <em>Prinz Adalbert</em>.  Sold to be broken up 1878.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Chicora</em></strong>, 150&#8242; type.  Destroyed to prevent capture in  Cooper River above Charleston Harbor 18 Feb 1865.  Wreck removed shortly  after 1870.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Columbia</em></strong>.  Ran hard aground on a sunken wreck near  Fort Moultrie in Charleston Harbor on 12 Jan 1865.  Refloated by Union  26 Apr 1865.  Sold to be broken up 10 Oct 1867.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Eastport</em></strong>.  Captured by Union while still incomplete 8 Feb 1862; see USS <em>Eastport</em>.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Fredericksburg</em></strong>.  Destroyed to prevent capture in James River near Drewry&#8217;s Bluff 4 Apr 1865.  Wreck still partially existing.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Georgia</em></strong>.  Scuttled to prevent capture near Old Fort  Jackson below Savannah 20 Dec 1864.  Wreck still exists in poor to fair  condition and some artifacts have been recovered.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Huntsville</em></strong>, <em>Huntsville</em> type.  Scuttled in Spanish River above Mobile Bay 12 Apr 1865.  Further fate unknown.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Jackson</em></strong> (&#8220;Muscogee&#8221;).  Destroyed to prevent capture in  Chattahoochee River 17 Apr 1865.  Wreck raised in 1963 and is on  display at Woodruff Museum (Confederate Naval Museum) in Columbus GA.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Louisiana</em></strong>.  Destroyed to prevent capture near Fort St. Philip below New Orleans 28 Apr 1862.  Wreck magnetically located 1981.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Manassas</em></strong>.  Disabled, abandoned, burned, and sunk at  the passing of the New Orleans forts 24 Apr 1862 (0 killed).  Wreck  magnetically located 1981.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Milledgeville</em></strong>.  Destroyed to prevent capture when nearly complete near Savannah 20 Dec 1864.  Further fate unknown.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Mississippi</em></strong>, &#8220;Laird ram.&#8221;  Seized prior to completion by UK 9 Oct 1863; entered service with Royal Navy as HMS <em>Wivern</em>.  Sold to be broken up 1922.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Mississippi</em></strong>.  Burned and set adrift from New Orleans  before completion 25 Apr 1862.  Hulk floated down to Southwest Pass and  grounded.  Salvaged by Union and taken to Brooklyn Navy Yard for  scrapping.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Missouri</em></strong>.  Surrendered at Alexandria LA 3 Jun 1865.  Sold to be broken up 29 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Mobile</em></strong>.  Destroyed before completion at Yazoo City MS 21 May 1863.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Nashville</em></strong>.  Surrendered at Nanna Hubba Bluff in Tombigbee River AL 10 May 1865.  Sold to be broken up 22 Nov 1867.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Neuse</em></strong>, <em>Albemarle</em> type.  Destroyed to prevent  capture in Neuse River near Kinston NC 14 Mar 1865.  Wreck raised in  1964, on display at Kinston NC.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>North Carolina</em></strong>, &#8220;Laird ram.&#8221;  Seized prior to completion by UK 9 Oct 1863; entered service with Royal Navy as HMS <em>Scorpion</em>.  Sunk as target ship at Bermuda 1901; further fate unknown.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>North Carolina</em></strong>, 150&#8242; type.  Accidentally sank at  moorings off Smithville NC (present day Southport) 27 Sep 1864.   Partially salvaged by Confederates during war and again in 1868.  Hulk  burned 7 Sep 1871.  Fragments still exist on bottom.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Palmetto State</em></strong>, 150&#8242; type.  Destroyed to prevent  capture at mouth of Town Creek above Charleston Harbor 18 Feb 1865.   Wreck removed prior to 1870.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Raleigh</em></strong>, 150&#8242; type.  Ran hard aground in Cape Fear  River near New Inlet 7 May 1864.  Wreck salvaged by Confederates.   Fragments still exist on bottom.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Richmond</em></strong>, 150&#8242; type.  Destroyed to prevent capture in James River near Chaffin&#8217;s Bluff 3 Apr 1865.  Wreck still partially existing.</li>
<li> &#8220;Santa Maria&#8221; or &#8220;Frigate No. 61.&#8221;  Never delivered to Confederacy; sold to Denmark December 1863, named <em>Danmark</em>.  Sold to be broken up 1907.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Savannah</em></strong>, 150&#8242; type.  Destroyed to prevent capture near Savannah 21 Dec 1864.  Further fate unknown.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Stonewall</em></strong>, <em>Stonewall</em> type.  Sold to the Spanish Captain-General of Cuba at end of the war, turned over to USA.  Sold to Shogun of Japan, renamed <em>Kotetsu</em>, arrived at Yokohama 24 Apr 1868, seized by Imperial forces.  Service in Japanese Civil War (Meiji Restoration).  Renamed <em>Adzuma</em>, 1871.  Discarded 1888.  Broken up 1908.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Tennessee</em></strong>, <em>Arkansas</em> type.  Destroyed before completion at Memphis 5 Jun 1862.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Tennessee</em></strong>.  Captured at Battle of Mobile Bay 5 Aug 1864, taken into Union service; see USS <em>Tennessee</em>.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Texas</em></strong>.  Never completed.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Tuscaloosa</em></strong>, <em>Huntsville</em> type.  Scuttled in Spanish River above Mobile Bay 12 Apr 1865.  Further fate unknown.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Virginia II</em></strong>.  Destroyed to prevent capture in James River near Drewry&#8217;s Bluff 3 Apr 1865.  Wreck still partially existing.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Virginia</em></strong>.  Destroyed to prevent capture near Craney Island VA 11 May 1862.  Remains removed in 1870s.</li>
<li> <strong>CSS <em>Wilmington</em></strong>.  Destroyed before completion Jan 1865.</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Union Ironclads</strong></span></p>
<ul><span style="color: #000080;"></p>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Agamenticus</em></strong>, <em>Monadnock</em> Class.  Survived war.  Renamed <em>Terror</em> 15 May 1869.  Sold to be broken up 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Ajax</em></strong> (ex-<em>Manayunk</em>), <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Commissioned after war&#8217;s end.  Sold to be broken up 10 Oct 1899.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Atlanta</em></strong> (ex-CSS <em>Atlanta</em>).  Survived war.  Sold to Haiti 4 May 1869, renamed <em>Triumph</em>.  Lost at sea off Cape Hatteras Dec 1869.  Wreck has never been located.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Baron de Kalb</em></strong> (ex-<em>St. Louis</em>), &#8220;City&#8221; Class.   Struck a mine and sank in Yazoo River 13 Jul 1863 (0 killed).  Wreck  partially salvaged during war.  Recently located, plans underway for  partial salvage.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Benton</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 29 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Cairo</em></strong>, &#8220;City&#8221; Class.  Survived war.  Stuck a mine and  sank in Yazoo River 12 Dec 1862 (0 killed).  Wreck located in 1956 and  raised in 1965; from 1980 on display at Vicksburg MS.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Camanche</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 15 Feb 1899.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Canonicus</em></strong>, <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 19 Feb 1908.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Carondelet</em></strong>, &#8220;City&#8221; Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be  broken up 29 Nov 1865.  Hull used as wharfboat on Ohio River until  washed downstream in a flood Apr 1873.  Remains destroyed by dredge  1982.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Casco</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Completed as torpedo boat.  Renamed <em>Hero</em> 15 Jun 1869.  Sold to be broken up 1 Apr 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Catawba</em></strong>, <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to Peru, renamed <em>Atahualpa</em>.  Service in War of the Pacific.  Scuttled at Callao 16 Jan 1880.  Raised 1880 and hulked; discarded about 1910.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Catskill</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 4 Dec 1901.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Chickasaw</em></strong>, <em>Milwaukee</em> Class.  Survived war.   Sold 12 Sep 74 at New Orleans to the New Orleans Pacific Railroad.  Acquired by the Texas &amp; Pacific Railroad in 1881 and converted to a  sidewheel railroad ferry. Renamed <em>Gouldsboro</em> 1882. Rebuilt twice  between 1881 and 1938; hull virtually replaced 1910. Active until 1941.  Some discussion about making the ship into a museum at Mobile AL but  nothing came of it; broken up 1944.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Chillicothe</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 29 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Chimo</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Completed as torpedo boat.  Renamed <em>Piscataqua</em> 10 Aug 1869.  Sold to be broken up 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Choctaw</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 28 Mar 1866.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Cincinnati</em></strong>, &#8220;City&#8221; Class.  Rammed and sunk at Battle  of Plum Point Bend, 10 May 1862 (1 killed).  Raised and repaired.  Sunk  by gunfire from Vicksburg 27 May 1863 (18 killed).  Raised and repaired.   Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 28 Mar 1866; hull sank near Cache  River below Mound City IL in 1866, further fate unknown.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Cohoes</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up Jul 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Dictator</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 27 Sep 1883.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Dunderberg</em></strong>.  Never commissioned.  Repurchased by builder 2 Mar 1867, sold to France July 1867, renamed <em>Rochambeau</em>.  Sold to be broken up 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Eastport</em></strong>.  Captured incomplete from Confederacy and  completed by Union.  Destroyed to prevent capture in Red River 26 Apr  1864.  Recently located.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Essex</em></strong> (ex-<em>New Era</em>).  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 29 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Etlah</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up 12 Sep 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Galena</em></strong>.  Armor removed mid-1863, recommissioned as a wooden sloop.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 1872.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Indianola</em></strong>.  Rammed and sunk near New Carthage MS 24  Feb 1863 (1 killed).  Wreck refloated by Union forces 5 Jan 1865, sold  to be broken up 19 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Iris</em></strong> (ex-<em>Shiloh</em>), <em>Casco</em> Class.  Sold to be broken up 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Kalamazoo</em></strong>, <em>Kalamazoo</em> Class.  Never completed.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Keokuk</em></strong>.  Sank off Charleston 8 Apr 1863 after being  struck over 90 times the previous day (0 killed).  Both XI-inch  Dahlgrens salvaged by Confederates 1 and 5 May 1863.  Wreck probably  still exists under silt off Sullivan&#8217;s Island; one Dahlgren on display  at White Point Gardens (Battery Park) in Charleston.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Kickapoo</em></strong>, <em>Milwaukee</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 12 Sep 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Klamath</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up 12 Sep 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Koka</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up Oct 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Lafayette</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 28 Mar 1866.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Lehigh</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 14 Apr 1904.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Louisville</em></strong>, &#8220;City&#8221; Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 29 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Mahopac</em></strong>, <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 25 Mar 1902.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Manhattan</em></strong>, <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 24 Mar 1902.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Marietta</em></strong>, <em>Marietta</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up 12 Apr 1873.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Miantonomoh</em></strong>, <em>Monadnock</em> Class.  Commissioned after war&#8217;s end.  Sold to be broken up 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Milwaukee</em></strong>, <em>Milwaukee</em> Class.  Struck a mine and  sank in Blakely River above Mobile Bay 28 Mar 1865 (0 killed).  Wreck  raised 1868 and scrapped; some iron may have been used to build Eads  Bridge at St. Louis.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Modoc</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Completed as torpedo boat.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up Aug 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Monadnock</em></strong>, <em>Monadnock</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Monitor</em></strong>.  Sank in gale off Cape Hatteras, 31 Dec 1862  (16 killed).  Wreck located September 1973, some artifacts recovered.   Upside down and not in good condition.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Montauk</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 14 Apr 1904.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Mound City</em></strong>, &#8220;City&#8221; Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 9 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Nahant</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 16 Apr 1904.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Nantucket</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 14 Nov 1900.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Napa</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Completed as torpedo boat.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Naubuc</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Completed as torpedo boat.  Renamed <em>Minnetonka</em> 10 Aug 1869.  Sold to be broken up 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Nausett</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Sold to be broken up Aug 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Neosho</em></strong>, <em>Neosho</em> Class.  Survived war.  Renamed <em>Osceola</em> 10 Aug 1869.  Sold to be broken up 17 Aug 1873.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>New Ironsides</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Caught fire and burned  up at League Island Navy Yard 16 Mar 1866 (0 killed).  Remains sold to  be broken up May 1867.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Oneota</em></strong>, <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to Peru 2 Apr 1868, renamed <em>Manco Capac</em>.  Service in War of the Pacific.  Scuttled at Arica 7 Jun 1880.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Onondaga</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Repurchased by builder 2 Mar 1867, sold to France.  Sold to be broken up 1903.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Osage</em></strong>, <em>Neosho</em> Class.  Struck a mine and sank in  Blakely River above Mobile Bay 29 Mar 1865 (4 killed).  Raised after  war.  Hull sold 22 Nov 1867, became merchant ship.  Possibly sunk in  Sodo Lake near Shreveport LA May 1870.  Further fate unknown.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Ozark</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 29 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Passaconaway</em></strong>, <em>Kalamazoo</em> Class.  Never completed.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Passaic</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 10 Oct 1899.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Patapsco</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Struck a mine and  sank in Charleston Harbor 15 Jan 1865 (62 killed).  Hulk blasted by  wreckers prior to 1870 and possibly again after 1870.  Some scattered  remains probably still exist between Forts Sumter and Moultrie.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Pittsburg</em></strong>, &#8220;City&#8221; Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be  broken up 29 Nov 1865.  Hull used as wharfboat; abandoned on rock bar  above Smithland KY Jun 1870; further fate unknown.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Puritan</em></strong>.  Never completed.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Quinsigamond</em></strong>, <em>Kalamazoo</em> Class.  Never completed.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Roanoke</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 27 Sep 1883.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Sandusky</em></strong>, <em>Marietta</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up 12 Apr 1873.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Sangamon</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 16 Apr 1904.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Saugus</em></strong>, <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 15 Mar 1891.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Shackamaxon</em></strong>, <em>Kalamazoo</em> Class.  Never completed.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Shawnee</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Sold to be broken up Aug 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Squando</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Renamed Algoma 10 Aug 1869.  Sold to be broken up 1 Jul 1874.</li>
<li> &#8220;Stevens Battery.&#8221;  Never completed.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Suncook</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Sold to be broken up Aug 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Tecumseh</em></strong>, <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Struck a mine and  sank at entrance to Mobile Bay 5 Aug 1864 (93 killed).  Wreck located  mid-1960s, some artifacts recovered.  Mostly intact, though with a hole  in the port bow and filled with mud and silt.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Tennessee</em></strong> (ex-CSS <em>Tennessee</em>).  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 27 Nov 1867.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Tonawanda</em></strong>, <em>Monadnock</em> Class.  Commissioned after war&#8217;s end.  Renamed <em>Amphitrite</em> 15 May 1869.  Sold to be broken up 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Tunxis</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Renamed Otsego 10 Aug 1869.  Sold to be broken up 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Tuscumbia</em></strong>.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 29 Nov 1865.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Umpqua</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up 12 Sep 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Wassuc</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up 9 Sep 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Waxsaw</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Renamed <em>Niobe</em> 15 Jun 1869.  Sold to be broken up 25 Aug 1875.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Weehawken</em></strong>, <em>Passaic</em> Class.  Accidentally sank  near Charleston 6 Dec 1863 (31 killed).  Wreckers salvaged engines and  destroyed turret and pilothouse prior to 1870; remainder of wreck  removed after 1870.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Winnebago</em></strong>, <em>Milwaukee</em> Class.  Survived war.  Sold to be broken up 12 Sep 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Wyandotte</em></strong> (ex-<em>Tippecanoe</em>), <em>Canonicus</em> Class.  Commissioned atfer war&#8217;s end.  Sold to be broken up 17 Jan 1899.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Yazoo</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.  Sold to be broken up 5 Sep 1874.</li>
<li> <strong>USS <em>Yuma</em></strong>, <em>Casco</em> Class.  Never commissioned.   Sold to be broken up 12 Sep 1874.</li>
<p></span></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=561</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are Admiralty Court Records?</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=539&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=what-are-admiralty-court-records</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=539#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admiralty Court Records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a common misconception that admiralty Court records are limited to cases pertaining to seamen and the vessels that traveled the high seas. While a court with admiralty powers regularly oversaw such matters as seamen&#8217;s wages, smuggling, piracy, prize (the confiscation of enemy ships and their cargo during wartime),shipwrecks, salvage, insurance, freight and passenger [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a common misconception that admiralty Court records are limited to cases pertaining to seamen and the vessels that traveled the high seas. While a court with admiralty powers regularly oversaw such matters as seamen&#8217;s wages, smuggling, piracy, prize (the confiscation of enemy ships and their cargo during wartime),shipwrecks, salvage, insurance, freight and passenger contracts, bottomry (using a ship as collateral), and contracts between merchants and mariners, they also had civil and criminal jurisdiction over all persons having any relation to maritime transactions, including shipbuilders and dockworkers.</p>
<p>Legal records pertaining to people that lived along the Of any navigable waterway the United States, including lakes, rivers, and anals, are likely to be found in admiralty courts. In addition to dockets and case files, a researcher may find evidence such as ship registers, licenses, crew lists, manifests, passenger lists, seamen&#8217;s contracts, logbooks, and other correspondence carried by ships.</p>
<p>Records from American admiralty as courts, as well as some English records obtained during the American Revolution, can be found in most branches of the National Archives. Pre-colonial records can sometimes be found in England as well.</p>
<p>To learn more try these books:</p>
<ul>
<li>Andrews, Charles M. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000N2JCE0?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=southeasterng-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B000N2JCE0">The Colonial Period of American History. Vol. 4: England&#8217;s Commercial and Colonial Policy</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=southeasterng-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000N2JCE0" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /><br />
. New Haven: Yak University Press, 1938.</li>
<li>Eakle, Arlene H &#8220;Research in Court Records.&#8221; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1593312776?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=southeasterng-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=1593312776">The Source: A Guidebook Of American Genealogy (Third Edition)</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=southeasterng-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=1593312776" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /><br />
. Rev. ed. Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1997.</li>
<li>Szucs, Loretto Dennis, and Sandra Hargreaves Luebking. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/091648923X?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=southeasterng-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=091648923X">Archives: A Guide to the National Archives Field Branches</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=southeasterng-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=091648923X" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /><br />
. Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1988.</li>
<li>Towle, Dorothy S. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0019LNYBG?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=southeasterng-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B0019LNYBG">Records of the Vice-Admiralty Court of Rhode Island 1716-1752</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=southeasterng-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B0019LNYBG" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /><br />
. Washington, D.C.:  American Historical Association Committee Legal History, 1939.</li>
<li>Ubbelhide, Carl. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0807807877?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=southeasterng-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0807807877">The Vice-Admiralty Courts and the American Revolution</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=southeasterng-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0807807877" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /><br />
. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1960.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=539</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>African Americans in the Revolutionary War</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=526&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=african-americans-in-the-revolutionary-war</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=526#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crispus Attucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethiopian Regiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Govener John Murry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Lafayette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolutionary War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironically the first By 1775 African Americans numbered more than 500,000 or roughly 25 percent of the North American population. Of these, only 10 percent were free, the rest subject to slavery or indenture. Nonetheless, many blacks had been at the forefront of political unrest in Massachusetts, and on March 5, 1770, Crispus Attucks was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically the first By 1775 African Americans numbered more than 500,000 or roughly 25 percent of the North American population. Of these, only 10 percent were free, the rest subject to slavery or indenture. Nonetheless, many blacks had been at the forefront of political unrest in Massachusetts, and on March 5, 1770, Crispus Attucks was killed at the so called Boston Massacre, becoming the first African American to die for his country. </p>
<p>As events unfolded, African Americans constituted a potential source of willing manpower for the Continental Army, but congress and many state political establishments loathed tapping them into them, for political and economic reasons. The southern colonies, where the bulk of the African American population was concentrated, were indelibly intertwined in issues relating to slavery and proved reluctant to sacrifice these economic benefits. Plantation owners were also unwilling to see slaves armed and trained for fear of fomenting an insurrection. For this reason Congress initially outlawed the recruitment of slaves into the armed forces and depended solely upon white volunteers. General George Washington, upon assuming command of Continental forces at Cambridge in July 1775, took this exclusion a step further and forbade the recruitment of blacks in general, slave and free alike. However, as manpower shortages became chronic due to lack of white volunteers, the prospect of African American recruitment became much more palatable, at least in the northern colonies. Several blacks were also successfully employed as spies, with James Lafayette being the most conspicuous example. </p>
<p>Ironically, the first African American military unit was recruited by Governor John Murry, Lord Dunmore, of Virginia, who issued a proclamation emancipating any slave who joined the British side. Consequently, around 300 former slaves were enrolled in the &#8220;Ethiopian Regiment&#8221;, which campaigned in Virginia until the British were finally expelled in the spring of 1776. Thereafter, it became standard British policy to recruit blacks for military for service in exchange for freedom, especially in the south. By wars end , the bulk of these were evacuated and resettled in Canada or the West Indies. </p>
<p>The United States promulgated no consistent policy toward African Americans, and hence many blacks were allowed to serve in the ranks, frequently as paid substitutes for unwilling whites. After 1776, when Congress authorized creation of 88 battalions of troops, state officials simply glossed over the fact that blacks were enlisted whenever the white population failed to provide its quota of troops. Once manpower levels became critical, Washington reversed himself, and on January 2, 1777, he authorized the enlistment of free blacks wherever possible. The practice was most prevalent in New England, where slavery was weakest, and African Americans joined in comparatively large numbers. </p>
<p>The famous unit to emerge from such practices was the 1st Rhode Island Light Infantry Regiment under Colonel Christopher Greene, which was racially mixed, if heavily black, and led by white company-grade officers. They distinguished themselves during the Battle of Rhode Island on August 29, 1778, and repelled several determined Hessian attacks. All told, by war&#8217;s end most American units had armed blacks marching directly in the ranks and , when permitted to serve, theey did so with distinction. Many of these soldiers were consequently manumitted from slavery in exchange for their military service. </p>
<p>The Armies of Spain and France had no such prohibitions against black enlistment, and both Governor Bernardo de Galvez and Admiral Charles-Hector-Theodat, comte d&#8217;Estaing, employed considerable numbers of French- and Spanish-speaking blacks in Louisiana, at the siege of Savannah, and elsewhere. In 1779 South Carolina representative and army officer John Laurens extolled the virtues of black soldiery and urged the governments of his native state and Georgia to recruit large numbers of slave’s into the army in exchange for freedom. It was a viable plan to address the chronic manpower shortages, but deep-seated enmity toward African Americans precluded its   adoption. African Americans enlisted in the military faced varying degrees of racial discrimination that militated against promotions and occupations held. Conditions proved far more accommodating in the Continental Navy, state navies, and in privateering, where far less emphasis was placed on race than ability. For many years prior to the Revolution, many free blacks and former slaves were attracted to service in either the merchant marine or the Royal Navy because harsh living conditions aboard were still better than those encountered on land. Consequently, ship crews frequently contained a much higher percentage of  African Americans as pilots, cooks, and gun crewmen, and they served throughout the war.</p>
<p>By 1783 around 5,000 African Americans had served in either the Continental army or navy, acquitting themselves well. They filled a critical niche in manpower needs, anticipating the role they would perform 80 years later during the Civil War, when liberty, denied them during the Revolutionary War, was finally realized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=526</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arlington Headstones in Creek Bed Catch Officials by Surprise</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=523&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=arlington-headstones-in-creek-bed-catch-officials-by-surprise</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=523#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cemetery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grrrrrrr!!! I'm a Mad Genealogist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tombstone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jake Gibson &#38; Steve Centanni, Published June 17, 2010 on FOXNews.com ARLINGTON, Va. &#8212; Several discarded headstones recently discovered in a creek bed near Arlington National Cemetery have left Department of Defense officials scrambling for answers. Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell called the discovery &#8220;alarming and concerning.&#8221; Pentagon officials as well as officials at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Jake Gibson &amp;  Steve  Centanni, Published June 17, 2010 on FOXNews.com</em></p>
<blockquote><p>ARLINGTON, Va. &#8212; Several discarded headstones recently discovered in a creek bed near Arlington National Cemetery have left Department of Defense officials scrambling for answers.</p>
<p>Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell called the discovery &#8220;alarming and concerning.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pentagon officials as well as officials at the Arlington National Cemetery had no idea about the existence of the headstones until they were made aware by a Washington Post story.</p>
<p>Patrick Hallinan, the incoming superintendent of the hallowed cemetery, will be meeting with officials from the Army Corps of Engineers on Friday. The upcoming meeting will &#8220;hopefully provide more clarity to the situation regarding the headstones in the creek bank,&#8221; Kaitlin Horst, a spokeswoman for Arlington National Cemetery, told Fox News.</p>
<p>Arlington National Cemetery officials think the headstones were placed there to &#8220;prevent erosion on the creek bed,&#8221; after being replaced and discarded, Horst said.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s important to the new management to take corrective action but also make sure removing the headstones doesn&#8217;t destabilize the environment in any way,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>Click here to read more at MyFoxDC.</p>
<p>One of the headstones in question is inscribed with a cross with a circle around it, a style that was discontinued in the late 1980s, leading officials to believe some of these headstones may have been in that creek bed for several decades.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is not part of our current headstone disposal policy,&#8221; said Horst.</p>
<p>The discovery is another black eye for the nation&#8217;s most sacred veterans cemetery, which recently was revealed to have mishandled more than 200 graves.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/virginia/labeled-tombstones-found-creek-arlington-national-cemetery-061710" target="_blank">Click here to read more at MyFoxDC.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=523</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the 1790 Federal Population Census Schedule?</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=509&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=509</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=509#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Census Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1790]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click to view/Print Blank US 1790 Census Extract Form The United States was the first country to call for a regularly held census. The Constitution required that a census of all &#8220;Persons&#8230;excluding Indians not taxed&#8221; be performed to determine the collection of taxes and the appropriation of seats in the House of Representatives. The first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onmouseover="window.status='http://www.ancestry.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;" href="http://www.anrdoezrs.net/la102p-85-7NQSWXOXTNPOSUSOPU?url=http://c.ancestry.com/pdf/trees/charts/1790.pdf">Click to view/Print Blank US 1790 Census Extract Form</a><img src="http://www.qksrv.net/ks82snrflj479DE5EA4659B956B" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>The United States was the first country to call for a regularly held census. The Constitution required that a census of all &#8220;Persons&#8230;excluding Indians not taxed&#8221; be performed to determine the collection of taxes and the appropriation of seats in the House of Representatives. The first nine censuses from 1790 to 1870 were organized under the United States Federal Court system. Each district was assigned a U.S. marshal who hired other marshals to administer the census. Governors were responsible for enumeration in territories.</p>
<table class="small_text_red" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="25" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top"><a class="small_text_red" href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/_images/r-census/1790-ct-newhaven.jpg"><img src="http://www.familyhistory101.com/_images/r-census/1790-ct-newhaven-sm.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="88" height="150" /></a></p>
<p><a class="small_text_red" href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/_images/r-census/1790-ct-newhaven.jpg"><img src="/_images/r-census/enlarge.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="77" height="17" /></a></p>
<p><a class="small_text_red" href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/_images/r-census/1790-ct-newhaven.jpg">Sample from US 1790 Census of New Haven County, CT</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>1790 Federal Population Census Schedule</em></span></strong></p>
<p>The 1790 census was begun on 2 August 1790. The marshals were expected to finish the census within nine months of the Census Day—by 1 May 1791. Although most of the returns were in long before the deadline, Congress had to extend the count until 1 March 1792. By that time some people probably were counted who had not been born or present in 1790.</p>
<p>The States covered in this census are <a href="http://www.myconnecticutgenealogy.com">Connecticut,</a> <a href="http://www.mymainegenealogy.com">Maine,</a> <a href="http://www.mymarylandgenealogy.com">Maryland,</a> <a href="http://www.mymassachusettsgenealogy.com">Massachusetts,</a> <a href="http://www.mynewhampshiregenealogy.com">New Hampshire,</a> <a href="http://www.mynewyorkgenealogy.com">New York,</a> <a href="http://www.mynorthcarolinagenealogy.com">North Carolina,</a> <a href="http://www.mypennsylvaniagenealogy.com">Pennsylvania,</a> <a href="http://www.myrhodeislandgenealogy.com">Rhode Island,</a> <a href="http://www.mysouthcarolinagenealogy.com">South Carolina,</a> <a href="http://www.myvermontgenealogy.com">Vermont</a></p>
<p><em>Because of the availability of the printed 1790 census schedules, researchers tend to overlook the importance of consulting the original schedules, which are readily available on microfilm. As in most cases, the researcher who relies on printed transcripts may miss important information and clues found only in the original version. </em></p>
<p><em>The 1790 census records are useful for identifying the locality to be searched for other types of records for a named individual. The 1790 census will, in most cases, help distinguish the target family from others of the same name; identify immediate neighbors who may be related; identify slaveholders; and spot spelling variations of surnames. Free men “of color” are listed as heads of household by name. Slaves appear in age groupings by name of owner. By combining those age groupings with probate inventories and tax list data, it is sometimes possible to determine names of other family members and the birth order of those individuals</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>Questions Asked in the 1790 Census</em></span></strong></p>
<p>Name of family head; number of free white males of sixteen years and older; number of free white males under sixteen; number of free white females; number of slaves; number of other persons; and sometimes town or district of residence. The 1790 census instructed the marshals to identify, by age brackets, free white males sixteen years of age or older and those under sixteen. It was designed to determine the country’s industrial and military capabilities. Additionally, the first census was to count the number of free white females; all other free persons regardless of race or gender; and slaves. A twenty-dollar fine, to be split between the marshals’ assistants and the government, would be levied against anyone who refused to answer the enumerator’s questions.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>Other Significant Facts about the 1790 Census</em></span></strong></p>
<p>The Constitution called for a census of all &#8220;Persons . . . excluding Indians not taxed&#8221; for the purpose of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives and assessing direct federal taxes. The &#8220;Indians not taxed&#8221; were those not living in the settled areas. In later years, Native Americans everywhere were considered part of the total population, but not all were included in the apportionment figures until 1940.The government did not provide printed forms or even paper until 1830. It was up to each assistant to copy his census return on whatever paper he could find and post it in two public places in his assigned area. Those who saw and could read them were supposed to check for discrepancies or omissions. The highest pay rate, two cents per person, barely covered expenses, especially where settlers were scattered and living in places that were difficult to find or access.The jurisdictions of the thirteen original states stretched over an area of seventeen present-day states. Census schedules survive for only two-thirds of those states. The surviving schedules were indexed by state and published by the Bureau of the Census in the early 1900s. Bureau of the Census, Heads of Families at the First Census of the United States Taken in the Year 1790, 12 vols. (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1908), can be found in most research libraries; it has been reprinted by various publishers over the years.</p>
<p>Both the original and printed 1790 census schedules are available on microfilm for <a href="http://www.myconnecticutgenealogy.com">Connecticut,</a> Maine (then part of Massachusetts), <a href="http://www.mymarylandgenealogy.com">Maryland,</a> <a href="http://www.mymassachusettsgenealogy.com">Massachusetts,</a> <a href="http://www.mynewhampshiregenealogy.com">New Hampshire,</a> <a href="http://www.mynewyorkgenealogy.com">New York,</a> <a href="http://www.mynorthcarolinagenealogy.com">North Carolina,</a> <a href="http://www.mypennsylvaniagenealogy.com">Pennsylvania,</a> <a href="http://www.myrhodeislandgenealogy.com">Rhode Island,</a> <a href="http://www.mysouthcarolinagenealogy.com">South Carolina,</a> and <a href="http://www.myvermontgenealogy.com">Vermont</a>. The schedules for <a href="http://www.mydelawaregenealogy.com">Delaware,</a> <a href="http://www.mygeorgiagenealogy.com">Georgia,</a> <a href="http://www.mykentuckygenealogy.com">Kentucky,</a> <a href="http://www.mynewjerseygenealogy.com">New Jersey,</a> <a href="http://www.mytennesseegenealogy.com">Tennessee,</a> and Virginia were burned during the War of 1812 (there are substitutes for most of these). Published and microfilmed 1790 schedules for Virginia were reconstructed from state enumerations and tax lists.</p>
<p>Census research is one of the first and most important steps in <a onmouseover="window.status='http://www.ancestry.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;" href="http://www.dpbolvw.net/ne98shqnhp47C6D5E54659C5A56?sid=FamilyTree&amp;url=http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/StartPed.aspx">constructing a family tree.</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/3h108z15u-yJMRLSKTKJLKORKPKL" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> Everyone from genealogists to historians use the federal census for researching family histories. Deciphering census data, however, is not always easy.</p>
<p>It is usually best to begin a census search in the most recently available census records (1930) and to work from what is already known about a family. With any luck, birthplaces and other clues found in these more recent records will point to locations of earlier residence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=509</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fort Chaffee Cemetery</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=438&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=fort-chaffee-cemetery</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=438#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cemetery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Rambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chaffee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can someone please identify this cemetery. Below is the email I received &#160;Dear Correspondent, While I was stationed at Fort Chaffee for basic training Oct 3 – 8 Dec, 1956, I remember seeing a cemetery that had a stone arch at the entrance. As I recall, it was located on the South side of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please identify this cemetery. Below is the email I received </p>
<p><a href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Fort-Chaffee_6.jpg"><img src="http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Fort-Chaffee_6-300x205.jpg" alt="" title="Fort Chaffee_6" width="300" height="205" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-439" /></a><br />
&nbsp;<b>Dear Correspondent,<br />
While I was stationed at Fort Chaffee for basic training Oct 3 – 8 Dec, 1956, I remember seeing a cemetery that had a stone arch at the  entrance. As I recall, it was located on the South side of the fort. Can you possibly  help me to identify this cemetery?<br />
With kind regards,<br />
<span style="color: #888888;"> John T. Gerlosky, CWO W3 USA Retired</span></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=438</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help I cant find my ancestors grave / marker?</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=434&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=help-i-cant-find-my-ancestors-grave-marker</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=434#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cemetery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your ancestor may have had a wooden marker that has long since deteriorated. So too, his gravestone may have been destroyed or moved. Probably the bestplace to start would be with the local genealogists in Onondaga County. It may be that his stone has toppled or was vandalized, but that it was read and recorded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your ancestor may have had a wooden marker that has long since deteriorated. So too, his gravestone may have been destroyed or moved.  Probably the bestplace to start would be with the local genealogists in Onondaga County.  It may be that his stone has toppled or was vandalized, but that it was read and recorded at some earlier point in history.  If this is the case, then the row location may have also been documented and you are well on your way to identifying his grave site.</p>
<p>When markers fall, they often lay right where they fell, have several inches of grass growing over them and can be probed for, found and subsequently reset in their original bases (also buried over time).  More often than not, down stones wind up elsewhere when cemetery maintenance personnel move them to prevent hitting them with mowing equipment.  I estimate that a typical early 19th century cemetery has at least 30% more burials than what is apparent on the surface today, and unfortunately some are far worse than others.</p>
<p>If you can determine for certain that he is buried on the premises, and in what approximate area, then the investigation becomes one of putting the pieces of the puzzle together.  Often a location can be determined by the process of elimination if you&#8217;re lucky enough to have adequate documentation that was accomplished at an earlier time. We have helped relocate many gravestones in the proper area by the means discussed above and without ever having to resort to subsurface imaging. </p>
<p>If need be, it is possible to identify the location of an unmarked grave using subsurface imaging equipment such as ground penetrating radar, magnetometry and or other means of electromagnetic measurement. </p>
<p>Again, your best bet is to try to prove that your ancestor was actually buried at that particular cemetery.  Local genealogists should be able to offer some insight one way or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=434</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1790-1840 Census Birth Year Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=389&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=1790-1840-census-birth-year-reference</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=389#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Census Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below, you will find a chart containing the approximate birth years for age listings on the census. Please remember, that before 1850 the census information on age was vague. 1790 Census BORN 1830 Census BORN 16 and Under Before 1774 Under 5 Between 1825-1830 Under 16 Between 1774-1790 5-10 Between 1820-1825 1800 Census 10-15 Between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below, you will find a chart containing the approximate birth years for age listings on the census. Please remember, that before 1850 the census information on age was vague.</p>
<table border="1" width="100%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="center"><strong><a href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/research-census/census1790.html">1790 Census</a></strong></td>
<td width="28%" align="center"><strong>BORN</strong></td>
<td width="4%" align="center"></td>
<td width="20%" align="center"><strong><a href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/research-census/census1830.html">1830 Census</a></strong></td>
<td width="28%" align="center"><strong>BORN</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">16 and Under</td>
<td width="28%">Before 1774</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">Under 5</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1825-1830</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">Under 16</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1774-1790</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">5-10</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1820-1825</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="center"><strong><a href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/research-census/census1800.html">1800 Census</a></strong></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">10-15</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1815-1820</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">Under 10</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1790-1800</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">15-20</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1810-1815</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">10-16</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1784-1790</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">20-30</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1800-1810</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">16-26</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1774-1784</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">30-40</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1790-1800</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">26-45</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1755-1774</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">40-50</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1780-1790</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">45 and Over</td>
<td width="28%">Before 1755</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">50-60</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1770-1780</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="center"><strong><a href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/research-census/census1800.html">1810 Census</a></strong></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">60-70</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1760-1750</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">Under 10</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1800-1810</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">70-80</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1750-1740</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">10-16</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1794-1800</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">80-90</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1740-1750</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">16-26</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1784-1794</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">90-100</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1730-1740</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">26-45</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1765-1784</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">100 and Over</td>
<td width="28%">Before 1730</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">45 and Over</td>
<td width="28%">Before 1765</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%" align="center"><strong><a href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/research-census/census1840.html">1840 Census</a></strong></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="center"><strong><a href="http://www.familyhistory101.com/research-census/census1820.html">1820 Census</a></strong></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">Under 5</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1835-1840</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">Under 10</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1810-1820</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">5-10</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1830-1835</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">10-16</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1804-1810</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">10-15</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1825-1830</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">16-18 (males only)</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1802-1804</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">15-20</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1820-1825</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">16-26</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1794-1804</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">20-30</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1810-1820</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">26-45</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1775-1794</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">30-40</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1800-1810</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%">45 and Over</td>
<td width="28%">Before 1775</td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">40-50</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1790-1800</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="center"></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">50-60</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1780-1790</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%"></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">60-70</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1770-1780</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%"></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">70-80</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1760-1770</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%"></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">80-90</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1750-1760</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%"></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">90-100</td>
<td width="28%">Between 1740-1750</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%"></td>
<td width="28%"></td>
<td width="4%"></td>
<td width="20%">100 and Over</td>
<td width="28%">Before 1740</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=389</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Wet Plate Photos</title>
		<link>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=385&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=civil-war-wet-plate-photos</link>
		<comments>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=385#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyhistory101.com/blog/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a web site of original Civil War photographs which  are truly amazing.  They were taken in Washington, DC,  Gettysburg, Fairfax &#38; Fredericksburg, VA,  and various other  locations.  Here are the directions for using the web  site. Run the cursor over the photograph and the picture. Caption will pop up. Click  photo to enlarge. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a web site of original Civil War photographs which  are truly amazing.  They were taken in Washington, DC,   Gettysburg, Fairfax &amp; Fredericksburg, VA,  and various other  locations.  Here  are the directions for using the web  site.</p>
<ul>
<li>Run the cursor over the photograph and the picture.</li>
<li>Caption will pop up.</li>
<li>Click  photo to enlarge.</li>
</ul>
<p>Truly fortunate that so many of these have survived. Probably a million wet plate photos were made during  the civil war on glass plate.  Popular during the war, they  lost their appeal afterwards and so many were sold for the  glass.  Many used in green houses. Over the years the sun  caused the images to disappear.</p>
<p>A compendium of photos from the  Civil War  era &#8220;Original Civil War Pictures&#8221;_<br />
<a href="http://www.mikelynaugh.com/VirtualCivilWar/New/Originals2/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.mikelynaugh.com/VirtualCivilWar/New/Originals2/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.familyhistory101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=385</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
